Partly idiotic with a chance of correctness
June 8, 2007
Not a big chance of correctness, though. Every time I look at a weather report lately, I am reminded of Lewis Black’s words:
“You know what the word ‘meteorologist’ means in English? It means liar.”
For lack of a better place, I usually get my forecasts from Weather.com. Over the years though I’ve developed an innate sense of what I can partially trust and what I can’t trust at all. For example, I can usually trust anything they say will happen within the next 12 hours. Usually. The 10-day forecast, though, is a complete joke, because over the course of 10 days each day’s prediction will change almost 10 times.
Then you have gems like today. I’m sitting in my office in downtown Indianapolis, and wondering if it’s going to rain soon. I go to Weather.com, which reports that today’s high is 81 F (it’s currently 83 F…interesting), and there’s a “slight” chance of rain at only 30%. The radar, meanwhile, is this:

…which I’m fairly certain a monkey could interpret to mean there’s a greater chance than 30% for rain.
Can someone recommend a place to get my weather from that doesn’t suck? The only thing I like about Weather.com is their interactive radar map. Other than that, I’ll be happy to leave the totally inaccurate predictions behind…not to mention the rest of their web site which is so chock-full of animated flash advertisements that I can feel my computer grinding to a halt whenever it loads the page.
(P.S. This post is a true test to see if Kim ever reads this site anymore
)









