Is Vista any good?
March 15, 2007
I’ve been asked this question so much over the last few weeks, I thought I’d finally write up my thoughts. This isn’t a full-blown review so it’s not going in Articles, but it’s got some length to it. If you don’t care about the details and just want the final verdict, skip the break and go to the end.
I spend all day, every day on computers. At work, I’ve had Vista installed for almost 6 weeks now. Truth be told, I don’t like it. It’s frustrating to work with after awhile. Even after becoming familiar with where Microsoft has hidden stuff (you know how many steps it takes to get to a network connection’s properties? Eight!!!!!), I don’t like working with it. Once you get over the glitz of Aero, which I thought was only moderately attractive to begin with, the “ergonomics” of Vista blow hard. There’s no consistency to the organization of menus, toolbar icons, or wizard interfaces. There’s new fancy control panels, and there’s control panels that have looked the same since Windows 95 (you want a real laugh? Go look at the Install Fonts window. Yeah. That’s the same one since Windows 3.1). There’s strange colors. There’s no more icons in the right half of the start menu — where Documents, Computer, Control Panel, etc are — which has really slowed me down because now instead of quickly recognizing an icon I actually have to read through a dozen things. You don’t realize the value of icons on common tasks until they’re gone, and then it’s irritating as hell. Idiots.
And last but certainly not least is UAC, Vista’s new security system. One word: annoying. Holy crap, it’s constantly asking to do anything. Way too much stuff is behind that UAC control in Vista — like a ton of control panel items that really don’t have a lot to do with system security. Also, even when security is necessary, it’s just very poorly implemented. Take my favorite example:
Let’s say you want to create a folder in Program Files so you can put uTorrent or PuTTY or some stand-alone program in there yourself for organizational purposes. You navigate to Program Files in Explorer, right click, and select New->Folder. You get (1) a UAC dialog telling you that what you’re about to do will require admin rights; you click continue and get (2) the real UAC authorization box; you continue, and now you have a new folder with its name “New Folder” highlighted so you can start typing. You type a new name and press enter, and get (3) a dialog telling you that what you’re about to do will require admin rights; you click continue and (4) get the UAC authorization box.
That’s FOUR damn UAC clicks just to create one folder!!!! That’s indicative of how annoying that system is. If it were done right, like Linux or Mac OS X, it would ask you once, and then remember that state for the duration of your folder-creating activity.
On top of the impressively poor usability, there’s a lot of programs that behave weird with Vista. Certain things like FireWorks or java apps will kill the nice Aero interface until you close them again. IE7 continues to be the default browser even though I’ve set FireFox to be the default over and over again, both in FireFox and in the Windows control panel. And on, and on, and on…
Which brings me to my main point: if you have a computer built in the last year or two then yeah, you can run Vista, but there’s not a lot of benefit to it. I actually have a free copy of Vista Business, but I’m not using it. You get XP on there, buttoned up with all the latest patches, FireFox, and a decent virus scanner, and if you aren’t a complete idiot it will be as secure and safe as Vista.
I never appreciated XP as much until Vista came out. Vista’s an overgrown, shiny, annoying hog of an OS. I can understand some people’s desire to have the latest and greatest, and by all means try it out for yourself and see if you like it — if you can do so without buying a copy (like on a friend’s computer or at the store). Do not actually BUY a copy of Vista unless you’re sure it’s going to do something miraculous for you, there’s really no reason to. XP can run anything Vista can run (for now and the forseeable future, anyway). Maybe things will improve with the inevitable Service Pack 1 for Vista, or once programs or games actually start requiring Vista (that will be awhile), but for now my verdict stands: Vista is not worth it.
Actually, my real advice is: buy a Mac. I did, and then quickly bought a second one, wondering how I survived with Windows for 15 years.
If you want any personalized advice about Vista, just start posting in the comments here and I’ll respond.









peelman March 15th, 2007 at 10:34 am
Amen. I’ve already moved to Mac/Linux, i encourage everybody to do the same. Microsoft has a lot of really smart people working there, i don’t understand why they insist on using code that is 15-25 years old.
Apple had the right idea, starting with such a great base as BSD and building a simplicity-driven GUI around it, then emulating whatever they had to for backwards compatiblity. There are so many things that the Mac does, either out of the box or via freeware apps, that PCs can’t touch.
Ed March 23rd, 2007 at 6:14 pm
I’m an old windows user. I started with 2.0. I just broke down and bought an iMac because I have finally had enough of Microsoft. The price Microsoft is charging for Vista blows my mind.
For me, it took so long to make the change because of the investment in software and the limited software for the Mac. I’m a Graduate student and use templates for M.S. Word to format my papers, and software like this is limited for the Mac. However, I think Microsoft created a price situation that will cause long time Windows users to jump ship.
One shortcoming that I see with Apple is that they need to make an office suite for the academic community. I want to be completely free of Microsoft but I need a “good†replacement. I need Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, with all the extras.
I should get my iMac Tuesday (March 27, 2007) and I hope it is as good as the Mac lovers’ claim that it is.
Ed
Matthew March 24th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Ed,
For me, the Office suite is the biggest tether I still have to the Windows world as well. I run Parallels on my Macs pretty much for the sole purpose of running Office 2003/2007. I hope to be able to cut at least part of that cord with Microsoft Office for Mac 2008, but ultimately I too would love an Apple solution that is compatible with most documents generated using Word for Windows.
If you’re going to make presentations on your own, though, get iWork and use KeyNote…there is no comparison. The last time I did a presentation, I used KeyNote and my competitors used PowerPoint. They looked humiliated when I finished
KeyNote makes PowerPoint look childish, and it’s easier to use on top of that.
Dan March 28th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
I have Windows Xp and I used this site to see if I should get windows but insead of that i want a Mac, but is still want to try Vista, but not buy it yet.
rogersmj.com: Why Vista's interface sucks April 5th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
[...] on some of the consistency issues I mentioned in my previous post about my experiences using Windows Vista, I feel the need to share this wonderful image I stumbled [...]
David April 20th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
Trouble is Vista’s been in the oven too long… way overcooked.
Sure ain’t a KISS approach (Keep It Simple Stupid), ought to be good fun when the patches start to arrive…
…. how much more RAM n’ disc space…. how much more slower, we’ll have to wait and see.
What is surprising is the length of time MS has been building OS’s about time they got something right for once.
Uncle Mark July 15th, 2007 at 10:20 am
please don’t punish me for giving you your 1st PC 15 years ago. by the way – awesome wedding!
RogersMJ.com: Vista: Windows ME all over again? November 14th, 2007 at 3:47 pm
[...] promised, the interface is just short of awful, and the new “security” system is really, really damn annoying. In short, it’s a half-baked, lame attempt to put out something just for the sake of having [...]