<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choose Wisely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/</link>
	<description>The blog &#38; portfolio of Matthew J. Rogers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: what is automaticity as to reading</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-19519</link>
		<dc:creator>what is automaticity as to reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-19519</guid>
		<description>[...] to hold the same beliefs. Think for yourself. Be a responsible citizen and think of your country. Thttp://rogersmj.com/articles/choosewiselyRESTRUCTURING OR AUTOMATICITY? READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE ...READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE. Beverly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to hold the same beliefs. Think for yourself. Be a responsible citizen and think of your country. Thttp://rogersmj.com/articles/choosewiselyRESTRUCTURING OR AUTOMATICITY? READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE &#8230;READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE. Beverly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogersmj.com: Finally, conservatives realize the GOP is not conservative</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>rogersmj.com: Finally, conservatives realize the GOP is not conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-2555</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that conservative leaders have finally awoken to what I&#8217;ve been saying for years: that the Republican party is not Republican anymore. They&#8217;re big spenders, trade destroyers, coddlers of illegal immigrants, and have generally just been riding to power on voters&#8217; visions of what Republicans used to be. Which makes the Republican party a bunch of big-scale liars, and makes the people that vote for them &#8212; at least the ones who think they&#8217;re still voting for the budget-minded, constitution-respecting party &#8212; gullible idiots. Yeah, that&#8217;s right&#8230;I&#8217;m not being nice, because few things piss me off more than when people blindly vote a party without paying attention to who they&#8217;re actually voting for. That goes for both sides of the fence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that conservative leaders have finally awoken to what I&#8217;ve been saying for years: that the Republican party is not Republican anymore. They&#8217;re big spenders, trade destroyers, coddlers of illegal immigrants, and have generally just been riding to power on voters&#8217; visions of what Republicans used to be. Which makes the Republican party a bunch of big-scale liars, and makes the people that vote for them &#8212; at least the ones who think they&#8217;re still voting for the budget-minded, constitution-respecting party &#8212; gullible idiots. Yeah, that&#8217;s right&#8230;I&#8217;m not being nice, because few things piss me off more than when people blindly vote a party without paying attention to who they&#8217;re actually voting for. That goes for both sides of the fence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogersmj.com</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>rogersmj.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>[...] By signing this law, Bush has directly violated the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the very foundations of this country. Yet he has &#8220;suggested that votes against the law show that Democrats would not protect the country from another terrorist attack&#8221; (proving my point about fear mongering in my recent article). Yeah, right. Because you can&#8217;t protect us unless you break the law and destroy our democracy, right Mr. Bush? Guess what: by doing so, you&#8217;re helping the terrorists win. They hate our way or life and our freedom for all people, no matter what race, gender, or creed. By taking away our freedoms and the basic rights of our democracy, we are playing into the terrorists&#8217; hands in their quest to destroy us. Great work, Mr. President. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By signing this law, Bush has directly violated the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the very foundations of this country. Yet he has &#8220;suggested that votes against the law show that Democrats would not protect the country from another terrorist attack&#8221; (proving my point about fear mongering in my recent article). Yeah, right. Because you can&#8217;t protect us unless you break the law and destroy our democracy, right Mr. Bush? Guess what: by doing so, you&#8217;re helping the terrorists win. They hate our way or life and our freedom for all people, no matter what race, gender, or creed. By taking away our freedoms and the basic rights of our democracy, we are playing into the terrorists&#8217; hands in their quest to destroy us. Great work, Mr. President. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Peelman</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Peelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Hear hear!  From my typically agnostic view point, you have given me renewed faith in Catholics.  I had always hoped there were a few of you left who could combine a little common sense with their faith.  

I won&#039;t jump into the larger debates, but i WILL say that i dont&#039; think your idea of everybody serving on congress woudl work.  There are some people just not meant to make decisions, or vote on them, that affect the lives of millions of people, however i will offer a compromise:  limit them to 1 or 2 terms.  We limit our presidential terms to 2.5, why not limit a congressman&#039;s to even smaller.  It scares me whenever i see somebody who&#039;s been in office as long or longer than i&#039;ve been alive.  

That said, here&#039;s one of my biggest beefs with our government, the Prohibition that still exists in the form of anti drug movements.  Our government has caused gangwars in almost every metropolitan area, caused the creation of violent cartels, missed out on billions of dollars in tax revenue, and LOSES Billions every year &#039;fighting&#039; drugs.  I&#039;m not a fan of drugs.  I have never touched them myself.  And i don&#039;t think EVERYTHING shoudl be legal, there are some controlled substances that shoudl remain as such.  hell, leave&#039;em all controlled, just let people pay to get jacked up legally and tax the hell out of it.  Our &#039;war on drugs&#039; has been happening for 30 years, yet numbers say they&#039;re losing ground every year.  We need to quit fighting it, legalize it, and pour some of the revenue gained back into education, rehab etc.  Meh, that&#039;s my pipe dream.  the logistics never work out, but i get sick of hearing about the trouble they cause with nothing obvious being done to attack the source of the problem:  the people who USE them.  not hte growers, cookers, distributors, or pushers.  the users are the root of the problem.  Either change how they use it or make the punishments for using stiffer (but then the politicians caught doing it couldn&#039;t weasel their way out as easily), or just HAVE punishments for using, since right now its practically nonexistant.

Like i said, there are a lot of people who don&#039;t need to be makign laws, and i&#039;m probaby one of them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear!  From my typically agnostic view point, you have given me renewed faith in Catholics.  I had always hoped there were a few of you left who could combine a little common sense with their faith.  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t jump into the larger debates, but i WILL say that i dont&#8217; think your idea of everybody serving on congress woudl work.  There are some people just not meant to make decisions, or vote on them, that affect the lives of millions of people, however i will offer a compromise:  limit them to 1 or 2 terms.  We limit our presidential terms to 2.5, why not limit a congressman&#8217;s to even smaller.  It scares me whenever i see somebody who&#8217;s been in office as long or longer than i&#8217;ve been alive.  </p>
<p>That said, here&#8217;s one of my biggest beefs with our government, the Prohibition that still exists in the form of anti drug movements.  Our government has caused gangwars in almost every metropolitan area, caused the creation of violent cartels, missed out on billions of dollars in tax revenue, and LOSES Billions every year &#8216;fighting&#8217; drugs.  I&#8217;m not a fan of drugs.  I have never touched them myself.  And i don&#8217;t think EVERYTHING shoudl be legal, there are some controlled substances that shoudl remain as such.  hell, leave&#8217;em all controlled, just let people pay to get jacked up legally and tax the hell out of it.  Our &#8216;war on drugs&#8217; has been happening for 30 years, yet numbers say they&#8217;re losing ground every year.  We need to quit fighting it, legalize it, and pour some of the revenue gained back into education, rehab etc.  Meh, that&#8217;s my pipe dream.  the logistics never work out, but i get sick of hearing about the trouble they cause with nothing obvious being done to attack the source of the problem:  the people who USE them.  not hte growers, cookers, distributors, or pushers.  the users are the root of the problem.  Either change how they use it or make the punishments for using stiffer (but then the politicians caught doing it couldn&#8217;t weasel their way out as easily), or just HAVE punishments for using, since right now its practically nonexistant.</p>
<p>Like i said, there are a lot of people who don&#8217;t need to be makign laws, and i&#8217;m probaby one of them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly on abortion. It&#039;s not the government&#039;s place to legislate such things; doing so is legislating religion and setting a dangerous precedent.

The direct democracy Kevin is referring to is something I learned watching a History Channel special about Athens. In the ancient Greek city, they didn&#039;t elect their senate representatives; each year, men were chosen at random via a lottery to serve in the senate. It was expected that at some point in his life, every man would sit on the senate at least once.

This made me think: what a fantastic idea. What a great way to get the people directly involved in the government and break the stranglehold the rich and powerful have. Obviously it wouldn&#039;t work for the whole government, but consider Congress. It would be a massive shift in the way things operate, but I think that citizens chosen at random (like for jury duty) could be asked to serve in Congress for a certain amount of time (they would have the option to decline for extenuating circumstances). The Senate could remain a representative (elected) body for the things that require a full-time career politican.

A pleasant fantasy, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly on abortion. It&#8217;s not the government&#8217;s place to legislate such things; doing so is legislating religion and setting a dangerous precedent.</p>
<p>The direct democracy Kevin is referring to is something I learned watching a History Channel special about Athens. In the ancient Greek city, they didn&#8217;t elect their senate representatives; each year, men were chosen at random via a lottery to serve in the senate. It was expected that at some point in his life, every man would sit on the senate at least once.</p>
<p>This made me think: what a fantastic idea. What a great way to get the people directly involved in the government and break the stranglehold the rich and powerful have. Obviously it wouldn&#8217;t work for the whole government, but consider Congress. It would be a massive shift in the way things operate, but I think that citizens chosen at random (like for jury duty) could be asked to serve in Congress for a certain amount of time (they would have the option to decline for extenuating circumstances). The Senate could remain a representative (elected) body for the things that require a full-time career politican.</p>
<p>A pleasant fantasy, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://rogersmj.com/2006/10/14/choosewisely/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersmj.com/articles/choose-wisely/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt.  I appreciate the unbiased approach you took in looking at our government.  I agree too that we need to keep an open mind and not vote blind.

I don&#039;t mean to open a can of worms here, but I&#039;m not sure that making abortions illegal is the correct answer.  I am a Christian and cringe at the thought of the operation.  However, making this illegal could turn into something similar to prohibition.  Abortions would probably still happen, but under more unsafe and dangerous conditions.  The solution to this problem is encouraging pregnant women to change there minds and realize that this is sin.  You&#039;ve heard the saying &quot;you can lead a horse to water...&quot;

As per our discussion, Matt, you should post some information about the direct democracy idea that you were talking about.  It sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt.  I appreciate the unbiased approach you took in looking at our government.  I agree too that we need to keep an open mind and not vote blind.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to open a can of worms here, but I&#8217;m not sure that making abortions illegal is the correct answer.  I am a Christian and cringe at the thought of the operation.  However, making this illegal could turn into something similar to prohibition.  Abortions would probably still happen, but under more unsafe and dangerous conditions.  The solution to this problem is encouraging pregnant women to change there minds and realize that this is sin.  You&#8217;ve heard the saying &#8220;you can lead a horse to water&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>As per our discussion, Matt, you should post some information about the direct democracy idea that you were talking about.  It sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

